The Impact of Synthetic vs. Natural Clothing on Your Health: What You Need to Know

In the modern era of fast fashion and mass production, the fabrics we wear daily are often chosen for convenience, cost, and style rather than health. Yet, the impact of clothing on our well-being extends far beyond aesthetics. The divide between synthetic and natural fabrics is not merely a matter of personal preference but one that affects our health on a biochemical level. Synthetic textiles, which are petroleum-based, introduce harmful compounds to the body, while natural fibers support a healthier, more breathable interaction with the skin.

---

Natural fabrics such as cotton, bamboo, linen, hemp, wool, and silk have been used for centuries due to their superior comfort, breathability, and compatibility with the human body. These fibers are derived from plants or animals, allowing them to work synergistically with the skin’s natural functions. Cotton, particularly when organically grown, is free of harmful pesticides and residues that can be absorbed through dermal contact (Shanbhag et al., 2022). Linen, made from flax, possesses antibacterial properties and is known for its durability and ability to wick moisture away from the skin, reducing the risk of irritation and bacterial overgrowth (Kostic et al., 2021). Wool is a natural insulator that regulates body temperature while also resisting dust mites and mold, making it a safer option for individuals with allergies (Woolridge et al., 2018). Silk, produced by silkworms, is prized for its hypoallergenic and moisture-wicking properties, providing a natural barrier against environmental pollutants (Hosseini et al., 2020).

In contrast, synthetic fabrics—including polyester, nylon, lycra, acrylic, elastane, polyamide, and spandex—are primarily derived from petrochemicals. These materials do not breathe naturally and often trap heat and moisture against the skin (epecially tight spandex derived fabrics used in workout wear) creating an environment where bacteria and fungi can thrive. More concerning is the presence of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in synthetic textiles. Many synthetic fibers contain xenoestrogens—compounds that mimic estrogen in the body—which have been linked to hormonal imbalances, reproductive disorders, and even certain cancers (Yang et al., 2019). Polyester, one of the most widely used synthetic fabrics, has been shown to release phthalates, a class of endocrine disruptors, when it comes into contact with body heat and sweat (Braun et al., 2021). Nylon, another common synthetic, is often treated with formaldehyde-based finishes, which can off-gas toxic compounds into the skin and respiratory system (Kumar et al., 2017). “We consume a credit card’s worth of plastic every week”, says CNN Editor Chris Cillizza.

Blended fabrics present an even greater risk, as they combine natural fibers with synthetic ones, undermining the benefits of natural textiles while still exposing the wearer to chemical contaminants. Clothing labeled as “cotton-blend” or “wool-blend” often contains a significant percentage of polyester or acrylic, reducing breathability and increasing the potential for chemical exposure (Gao et al., 2022). These blends are not only more difficult to recycle but also contribute to the growing environmental crisis of microplastic pollution, as synthetic fibers shed microscopic particles with each wash, infiltrating water supplies and marine ecosystems (Henry et al., 2019).

The health implications of synthetic clothing extend beyond simple skin irritation. Prolonged exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals has been linked to metabolic disorders, immune dysfunction, cancer, infertility, miscarriage, menstrual issues and painful periods and neurological effects (Gore et al., 2017). Many individuals unknowingly exacerbate conditions such as eczema, hormonal acne, and chronic inflammation by wearing synthetic fabrics daily. While these issues are often attributed to diet and environmental pollutants, the role of clothing in chemical exposure is frequently overlooked. The skin, as the body’s largest organ, absorbs toxins from direct contact, making fabric choice a crucial aspect of holistic health.

For those seeking to reduce their exposure to harmful chemicals, opting for certified organic cotton, hemp, and untreated wool can significantly lower toxic load. Looking for labels such as GOTS (Global Organic Textile Standard) or OEKO-TEX certification ensures that textiles are free from hazardous substances. Additionally, washing new clothing before wearing it can help remove some of the chemical finishes applied during manufacturing.

The intersection of fashion and health is an area that demands greater awareness. While the modern textile industry prioritizes efficiency and cost reduction, the long-term consequences of synthetic clothing on human health are undeniable. Choosing natural fibers is not merely an aesthetic decision but a step toward reducing toxic burden and supporting overall well-being. To learn more about how xenoestrogens impact the body and why reducing exposure is crucial, refer to my previous blog on endocrine disruptors and their hidden dangers in everyday products.

References

Braun, J. M., Sathyanarayana, S., Hauser, R. (2021). Phthalate exposure and children’s health. Environmental Health Perspectives, 129(4), 045001.

Gao, W., Zhang, H., Zhang, Y. (2022). Assessing the health impact of textile fibers: A systematic review. Textile Research Journal, 92(10), 1345–1358.

Gore, A. C., Chappell, V. A., Fenton, S. E., et al. (2017). EDC-2: The Endocrine Society’s second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocrine Reviews, 38(4), 254–291.

Henry, B., Laitala, K., Klepp, I. G. (2019). Microplastic pollution from textiles: A review of the literature. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(21), 12343–12356.

Hosseini, S. M., Mirjalili, M., Amiri, R. (2020). Natural silk and its antimicrobial properties: A review. Journal of Textile Science & Engineering, 10(1), 1–7.

Kostic, M., Dimitrijevic, S., Dimitrijevic, B. (2021). The antibacterial properties of flax linen. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 265–272.

Kumar, R., Rai, B. N., Singh, P. (2017). Formaldehyde emission from textiles and its health effects. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, 52(6), 465–476.

Shanbhag, V., Raghuveer, A., Kumar, V. (2022). Organic cotton vs conventional cotton: A comparative study on health impact. Journal of Sustainable Textiles, 7(3), 201–218.

Woolridge, A. C., Ward, G. D., Phillips, P. S. (2018). Sustainable properties of wool textiles. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 792–800.

Yang, C. Z., Yaniger, S. I., Jordan, V. C., et al. (2019). Most plastic products release estrogenic chemicals: A potential health risk. Environmental Science & Technology, 53(3), 404–412.